Interview Details
Case Information
Interviewing Officer
Recording Details
Breaks
| # | Start | End | Duration (mins) | Reason |
|---|
Total break time: 0 mins | Net interview time: —
Persons Present
All Persons in Interview
Include all persons present at any point: interviewers, interviewee, legal representatives, appropriate adults, interpreters, observers.
| Role | Name / Initials | Rank / Title | Organisation | Training Level | Entire Interview |
|---|
No persons added yet.
Interviewee Profile
This information contextualises the analysis. It is stored locally only — never transmitted.
Interviewee Characteristics
Mental Health Conditions (as reported or known)
Neurodivergence & Cognitive Considerations
Physical Health & Other Considerations
Transcript / Audio / Video Recording
Transcript Entry
VeriScope needs speaker labels at the start of each line.
Interviewer: INT: I: INTERVIEWER: OFFICER: DC: Q: or any rank/name followed by a colon (e.g. DC Jones:)
Interviewee: S: SUB: SUBJECT: SUSPECT: WITNESS: VICTIM: A: R:
Also accepted: timestamps before labels (e.g. [00:14] INT:) and bare Q / A format used in legal transcripts.
Interviewee: S: SUB: SUBJECT: SUSPECT: WITNESS: VICTIM: A: R:
Also accepted: timestamps before labels (e.g. [00:14] INT:) and bare Q / A format used in legal transcripts.
📊
Complete the interview details and transcript, then click Run VeriScope Analysis.
Overall Interview Quality Score
—/ 100
ⓘ How is this score calculated?
The overall score is a weighted composite of five dimensions, each scored 0–100:
| Dimension | Weight | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|
| Question quality | 30% | Up to 70 pts for productive ratio; +20 pts for open invitation (TED) proportion; penalties for leading (−30), multiple (−20), forced-choice (−15) and opinion/statement (−10) questions |
| Rapport & empathy | 20% | +10 pts per ground-rules utterance; +12 pts per empathic continuer (EOC); −20 pts per empathic terminator (EOT). Built from detected behaviours only — no baseline offset |
| Non-coerciveness | 25% | Starts at 100; −15 pts per detected instance of coercive or oppressive language (threats, minimisation, evidence bluffs, persistent re-asking) |
| Silence / pausing | 10% | Starts at 100; −20 pts per detected premature interruption of the interviewee (Shepherd, 2007 — "filling the pause") |
| Méndez compliance | 15% | Each of 7 Méndez Principles assessed as met / partial / not met from transcript patterns and form data. Score calculated proportionally from statuses |
Scores are generated automatically from transcript analysis and should be interpreted as indicative indicators, not definitive judgements. Manual amendments to question types (using the dropdown in the utterance log) will update the scores on re-analysis. Framework references: Oxburgh, Myklebust & Grant (2010); Griffiths & Milne (2006); Shepherd (2007); Méndez Principles (UN, 2021).
Utterance-by-Utterance Analysis Log
Every utterance is classified. Filter by type. Hover truncated text to read in full. Concern-type utterances are highlighted.
Question Type Analysis (Oxburgh, Myklebust & Grant, 2010)
Question Flow — Radial Spiral
Each arc = one interviewer utterance, clockwise from 12 o'clock
Rapport & Empathy Analysis (Oxburgh & Ost, 2011; Barrett-Lennard, 1981)
Breaks Summary
Méndez Principles Compliance
Coercive / Oppressive Language
Use of Silence & Pausing
Speaking Time Distribution
Vulnerability & Adaptations
Expert Narrative Summary
🎯
Reflective Learning & Development
Based on your interview data